• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Simplicity Rules

Adam DuVander on keeping it simple

  • About Adam

Objects in browser are smaller than they appear

January 19, 2007 by Adam DuVander

The world isn’t as big as we think it is. Our little corner may be excited about Thing A, but that does not mean everybody feels the same way, as much as it seems like it.

Eric Sink, from Baptists and Boundaries:

One of my favorite things about the web is all the individual communities that live there in the form of discussion boards. The web connects people in ways that were never possible before. When we find ourselves in a discussion forum with people from five different continents, that forum looks really big. But it’s still just five people.

The niches of niches are pretty interesting to me, but they can be dangerous. If you find yourself caught in this trap, it may be time to think bigger.

As I said in Everybody rarely means everybody:

Sometimes I read Webmaster forums, and I’m perplexed at how popular it is for participants to create their own Webmaster resources. Why? Because they see it as a lucrative business to be in because everybody cares about it like they do.

Read Eric’s entire piece and, unless you’re Baptist, check out the joke.

Simpler for whom?

January 18, 2007 by Adam DuVander

As I’ve thought about the different things simplicity can mean, I realized there’s a big difference between making something simple for me and making something simple for someone else. Worse yet, if we only focus on making life simple for ourselves, that’s when some of the most complex things for others are made.

Suckbusters has a story about Notepad’s confirmation box. I’m not sure if it’s as bad as the author says, but the point is that the programmers weren’t thinking like a user. They were making things easy on themselves.

It takes simplicity for most of us to be able to be productive, much like Tom’s simple answer about clearing his mind.

When I start a new project, I always need to trim it down to make sense of its simplest state. Once I have a rough draft version, I can add the obvious features first.

The trouble is knowing when it’s worth making my life a little more complex. Usually if I think in terms of how a feature should be, I realize it’s worth whatever technical hurdles there are to get there.

Joel Spolsky calls this bringing “the program model in line with the user model.” His book User Interface Design for Programmers is worth a read even if you aren’t a programmer.

Yahoo! should live in the now

January 17, 2007 by Adam DuVander

I’m not much of a stock market guy, but I have periodically bought shares of companies I believe in. One of those is Yahoo!. I think their content strategy resonates with most people, and we each have at least one “channel” we could return to daily.

The last two years of YHOO (and when I bought shares)

The last year was pretty bad for YHOO, the stock. My investment was minimal, so I haven’t lost much money. I have lost a little bit of faith in the company. At every turn, their excuse is the delayed launch of their new advertising system, “Panama.”

This reminds me of a future-bound personal rut we’ve probably all succumbed to in some way:

  • Life will be different when I start driving.
  • It’ll all be better once high school is over
  • Well, I just need to get through college…
  • Once I have a job…
  • First I need a house
  • After the first million, I’ll relax

The answer is to live in the now. As new-agey as it seems (though I mean it as a Wayne’s World reference), it solves the personal rut, and gets the focus off some silver bullet. There rarely are silver bullets that make everything perfect. Panama won’t be one.

Brad Feld says Yahoo! should “take a shot this time at being bold (rather than just follow ‘slow and steady execution’) if they really want to assault Google this time around.” That sounds like in the now thinking. Way.

Simple answers

January 17, 2007 by Adam DuVander

There were some great definitions of simplicity that I thought I would share.

Tom:

Maybe it’s just because I finished up GTD, but for me simplicity is getting everything out of my mind so I can make right choices, well, simply.

Noah:

that is a great question about something so simple that we hardly think about it. maybe that is what simple means to me

“something you understand without instructions”

Jon:

Simplicity is one of those things that only ever pops into my head when it’s absent. It’s not something anyone achieves, but success is marked in how closely one comes to it–sort of like being a good person, or golfing a perfect game.

Great stuff guys. Thanks for sharing.

How to keep your inbox clean by planning ahead

January 16, 2007 by Adam DuVander

We all deal with information overload. Staying on top of email is my number one priority. It helps me remain in contact with colleagues, family, friends, and even strangers.

The solution that works for me is to keep my inbox clean. When new messages come in, I make a decision about them right away:

  1. Answer right away, if it’s short
  2. Delete it
  3. Decide when I’ll act on it or reply

Empty inbox!

When I don’t reply immediately or delete the email, I drag it to a sub-folder of my “reply later” box. I have a folder for each weekday, one for the weekend, and another for the following week.

To plow through a lot of messages, either in my inbox in the morning, or in a daily box that has built up, I use the tips from The Empty Inbox.

  • « Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • …
  • Page 43
  • Page 44
  • Page 45
  • Page 46
  • Page 47
  • …
  • Page 85
  • Next Page »

Simplicity Series

  • Designing the Obvious
  • Paradox of Choice
  • Laws of Simplicity

Copyright © 2025 · Elevate on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in